Christian Rados, biotech executive headhunter and founder of Rados Recruiting, Munich

Biotech Executive Search.

The right person for your next stage. Permanent in under 30 days, interim in 3.

C-Level. Permanent, Interim, Fractional and Board Roles

100+ clients since 2011. Biotech, among them:
AmgenBavarian NordicBaxterBiogenBioNTechHookipaImmunicleon nanodrugsValanx

Recruiting the right leadership team should be the top priority. In reality, it gets done half-baked.

Most biotech CEOs and investors hire a strong executive and find out 18 months later: wrong person. The CV was right, the stage was not. The problem is never finding someone. The problem is getting the one person who fits the stage of the company, who delivers, who thrives in the job, and who does not cost you 18 months of time and money.

I solve this problem. My approach checks three things: skill fit, stage fit and need fit. Skill fit is the floor, experience, track record, location, contract, the things every serious search checks, and so do I. Stage fit asks whether this person fits the phase the company is in right now, and need fit asks whether the job feeds what drives them, because that is what makes them deliver and stay. See the Rados Method

And still it gets done half-baked, because three things are stacked against you.

No time.

You have a trial to run and a round to close. A C-level search done properly takes weeks of focused work. Every one of those hours comes out of the company.

Not your field.

A scientist-CEO hiring a CFO. A CFO hiring a CMO. You can judge the person. You cannot judge the function, and the CV will not tell you whether they have done it at your stage.

You only see who applies.

The best person for the seat is usually employed, not looking, and three conversations away from your network. Applications show you who is available, not who is right.

Average is expensive.

The bill comes later. A year of lost momentum. Sometimes EUR 20 to 40M of avoidable dilution. Sometimes EUR 200M left on the table in a partnership negotiated by the wrong person.

I have seen this across fifteen years, four biotech cycles and over a thousand executive conversations that ended in a placement. It is a structural problem. It needs a structural answer, not a better job ad. If you sit on the investor side: the same three things work against your portfolio CEO, and the bill lands in your fund.

The Rados Method: two fits.

Every serious HR team or agency checks the basics: skill, experience, location, contract type, availability, languages. That is the job description, and I check it on every candidate across the whole market, not just the ones who happen to be available. My briefing does not start there. It starts with the company. Two fits, in fixed order: stage fit, then need fit. Those two are new, and they decide whether the hire holds. Most searches stop at the job description, and a year later everyone is surprised. People get hired for their skills and let go for their personality. That does not have to happen. It happens because nobody checked the two fits.

SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. HIRED FOR SKILLS. FIRED FOR PERSONALITY. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS. SKILLS.
01
Part one

Stage fit.

What does your stage demand, and what does it feed?

A Series A company and a Phase 2 company do not need the same CFO. I place the company on a six-stage lifecycle from what I can see: the round, the headcount, the clinical phase, the board. The stage sets two things. Which capabilities the seat demands right now, and which needs the seat can feed. That is the profile I search against, not the title.

02
Part two

Need fit.

Will this person stay long enough?

Capability gets a person hired. Whether the seat keeps feeding the two of six human needs that drive them decides whether they stay and do their best work. The need stays constant. When the role changes, what feeds those needs changes with it, and a person can starve on the needs that matter most.

Five clients, in their own words.

Every quote is public and linked to the original.

“Christian knows the biotech scene, quickly understands what kind of talent a young company needs, and finds the right people. Highly recommended for biotech founders and CSOs who are building their teams.”

Klaus Orlinger, Chief Scientific Officer, VALANX Biotech. Before that Chief Scientific Officer at HOOKIPA Pharma. Rated 5 of 5.
ProvenExpert, September 2026

“I am working with Christian since a couple of years and so far he has identified more than ten experts and leaders for me which I was happy to recruit and which are doing an excellent job for my company and me.”

Christoph Klaus, Chief Integrations Officer, Prange Pharma Group. At the time of the recommendation CEO Klosterfrau Berlin and Group COO, Klosterfrau Healthcare Group.
LinkedIn recommendation, March 2025

“Christian has an incredible large network, a deep understanding about the (bio-)pharmaceutical industry and is able to translate job specifications into attractive opportunities.”

Roman Necina, VP & GM Viral Vector, Cytiva. Client at Hookipa, where he was Chief Operating Officer.
LinkedIn recommendation, March 2025

“I worked with Christian multiple times and I'm happy he introduced me to some of my today's favorite colleagues.”

Florian Haas, Procurement Leader at BioNTech until 2026.
LinkedIn recommendation, November 2024

„Individuelle, effiziente und schnelle Betreuung: Rados Recruiting kennt Industrieumfeld und Kandidaten-Background stets sehr genau.“

Translated from German: “Personal, efficient and fast support. Rados Recruiting knows the industry and the candidates' backgrounds in detail.”

Christian Nafe, Chief Financial Officer, leon nanodrugs. Rated 5 of 5.
ProvenExpert, September 2026

Different stage, different executive.

Every search I run starts with the first fit, stage. The reason is simple: the same title is two different jobs, depending on where the company sits. The CFO who gets you through Seed is not the CFO who gets you through Series C. The table puts two stages side by side, Build and Scale, and shows what the same title has to deliver in each. Where your company sits on the six-stage lifecycle, and which seat is due next, is what the first call is for.

At Build (Series A, 10 to 30 people)At Scale (Phase 3 and pre-commercial, 100 to 250 people)
CEOConviction and storytelling. Sells the science to investors, hires the first ten, still in lab meetings.Institutional leadership. Multi-site clinical operations, a real BD function, a board that thinks in quarters. Not in lab meetings.
CFONo CFO job yet. A financial manager: clean close, cap table, next round.A CFO job. Institutional financings, commercial scenarios, a credible peer opposite analysts and crossover investors.
CMONo full-time CMO, and there should not be. A medical advisor or a fractional CMO, two days a month.The senior clinical voice. Phase 3 in several markets, regulators, KOLs, a clinical organisation of 30 to 80.
CBO, COOThe CBO opens doors and closes the first licensing deal. The CEO is the COO.The CBO negotiates the USD 500M partnership from inside the room. The COO runs the company while the CEO faces outward.

Not sure which seat is due? Fifteen minutes on a call. I name the seat, the reason and whether it should be permanent or fractional.

Want to know if you need a CFO? Fifteen pages on when the seat is due, which of the three CFO jobs your stage needs, and what to check before you sign.

You know which seat is due. Now, which shape?

Not every seat needs a full-time executive on the payroll, and the wrong shape costs as much as the wrong person. Fractional, interim or permanent is not a budget question. It is a question of what the work actually is. So before you decide, write down the actual work for one month. Not the title. The work.

A few decisions a month
A full week, every week
The work is ongoing
Fractional

Judgement, not hours. If the scope grows twice by day ninety, it was never fractional.

Permanent

You are hiring for the raise and the stage after it.

The work ends on a date
An advisor

Not a C-level seat. Do not give it the title, you will not get it back.

Interim

A defined build with an end. Or you started too late.

Three services. Each solves a different problem.

01 Permanent

A seat needs the right person. A new one, or a better one.

Sometimes the stage calls for a role that didn't exist yet: the first real CFO, the first CMO. Sometimes the seat is held by the leader who got you here and won't get you there. Either way, I find the person who fits the stage you're entering. Shortlist in days. Closed in under 30.

So the right leader is in the seat before the gap costs you a round. Or a year you can't get back.

02 Interim & Fractional

You need leadership now. A permanent hire is months away or premature.

A clinical readout is coming and the CMO seat is empty. Series A is close and a full-time CFO isn't justified yet. The cycle turned and you need a steady hand between CEOs. I place senior interim and fractional leaders at C-level. Interim C-level placements in three days.

So you have the leader you need right now, without betting the company on a permanent hire it isn't ready for.

03 Board & Advisory

Your cap table hands you a board. It doesn't hand you help.

The seats get filled either way. That's governance, the easy part. The hard part is filling them with people who change the outcome: a director who's raised the round you're about to raise, a chair who's run a CEO succession. The wrong board costs you nothing visible. Until the financing stalls or a decision you are making for the first time goes wrong, and the seat is already taken.

So when the big decision comes, the help is already in the room.

12months

The guarantee.

If a permanent executive I placed leaves within twelve months, I run the search again at no additional fee. The two fits are not a promise of effort. They are a promise of outcome, and I carry the risk of being wrong.

Book a call

Biotech ecosystem.

Shortlists in days come out of a network I have kept warm since 2011. Mentor at Life Science Nord. Host of Willing to Win, with guests from HTGF, BIO Deutschland, Van Lanschot Kempen and the BIOTECH AUSTRIA network.

Mentoring and podcast partners
Life Science Nord HTGF, High-Tech Gruenderfonds BIO Deutschland Van Lanschot Kempen BIOTECH AUSTRIA

Life Science Nord

Mentor

Mentor in the Life Science Nord Mentoring Network. Quarterly one-hour sessions with life science startups on leadership, executive recruiting and team composition.

Achim Plum

Podcast guest

Managing Director, High-Tech Gründerfonds (HTGF), Life Sciences. HTGF shared the episode on its LinkedIn page.

Oliver Schacht

Podcast guest

Managing Director, Life Science Nord. Former Chairman, BIO Deutschland. Posts and comments on the podcast.

Jan De Kerpel

Podcast guest

Managing Director and Head of Life Sciences, Van Lanschot Kempen Investment Banking.

Klaus Weinberger

Podcast guest

CEO, Metaron Diagnostics, Austria. Co-inventor of one of the first real-time PCR assays. Part of the BIOTECH AUSTRIA network.

Willing to Win: Biotech Leaders Against All Odds.

A long-form podcast featuring biotech founders, CEOs and Chairpersons who have built companies through real adversity: failed trials, board fights, near-bankruptcy, regulatory setbacks, personal cost. Not the highlight reel. The willingness.

Episode 21Latest episode

Episode 21 | I Shouldn't Be Here: Moderna's First CSO on Making Life Count (Antonin de Fougerolles)

Antonin "Tony" de Fougerolles · Founding Chief Scientific Officer of Moderna; board chair and investor

Tony de Fougerolles was born in Montreal three months premature, weighing about a pound and a half. He was the youngest child in Canada to survive at that age and weight. Twenty years of operations followed: doctors two or three times a week, surgery every summer, every Christmas. Ask him what he would change, and he says: nothing. "I shouldn't be here. This is all extra, let's make the most of it."

22 Dr. Achim Plum Episode 22 | So, Do We Have a Deal? (Achim Plum, HTGF) Dr. Achim Plum · Managing Director of HTGF (High-Tech Gründerfonds), heading Life Science and Chemistry →
20 Wolfgang Hofmann Episode 20 | I Can't Not Be Fascinated (Wolfgang Hofmann) Wolfgang Hofmann · CEO, leon-nanodrugs (Munich) →
19 Karol Jarzabek Episode 19 | We understand only 8 % of Biology (Karol Jarzabek) Karol Jarzabek · Chief Operating Officer, iOrganBio →
18 Rosario Episode 18 | Turning down the obvious path (Rosario "Charo" Cestau Murphy) Rosario "Charo" Cestau Murphy · Life sciences commercial executive, Strategic Planning at Untech; formerly Biogen, Vertex and Genzyme →
17 Dr. Dominik Witzigmann The Fight for Thousands is not over (Dominik Witzigmann) Dr. Dominik Witzigmann · Co-Founder and President of Nanovation Therapeutics →
16 Tilmann Bürckstümmer Episode 16 | Why This CRISPR Founder Built a Biotech Without VC Money (Tilmann Burckstummer) Tilmann Bürckstümmer · Co-founder, Myllia Biotechnology →
15 Jan de Kerpel The Truth About Biotech Funding Nobody Wants To Admit Jan de Kerpel · Investment Banker, Managing Director Van Lanschot Kempen →
14 Simone Sabbione FemTech's Trillion-Dollar Question Nobody Asked (Simone Sabbione -Meliodays) Simone Sabbione · Co-founder, Meliodays →
13 Chris Przybyszewski From Shakespeare to a Biotech Exit (Chris Przybyszewski) Chris Przybyszewski · Serial biotech founder (five companies, including US Biologic) →
12 Miguel Coego Rios What Nobody Told Me About Resilience — A CFO's Hard Warning (Miguel Coego Rios) Miguel Coego Rios · CFO of a major biotech company in rare diseases →
11 Klaus Weinberger Sabotaged and Still Building | Klaus Weinberger Klaus Weinberger · CEO, Metaron Diagnostics; co-inventor of one of the first real-time PCR assays →
10 Melissa Simon What Investors Look For in Founders - Trust, Femtech & VC Decisions Melissa Simon · Partner, Family Office Wieland Capital →
9 Dr. Pierre Morgon The Biggest Pain as a Leader? 40 Years of Hard Truths in Biotech (Pierre Morgon) Dr. Pierre Morgon · Founder of MRGN Advisors; former EVP at CanSino Biologics and VP at Sanofi Pasteur →
8 Peter Seufer-Wasserthal Every Chapter Needs a Different You - The Cost of Not Transforming (Peter Seufer-Wasserthal) Peter Seufer-Wasserthal · Chairman of the Board at Imperagen and PlanetSmart →
7 Zoltan Magyarics How The Biotech Game Breaks Your Idealism - A Drug Hunter's Confession (Zoltan Magyarics) Zoltan Magyarics · VP of R&D at AOP Health; physician and PhD immunologist →
6 Erich Tauber What Nobody Tells You About a Life-Changing Deal (Erich Tauber) Erich Tauber · Co-founder and former CEO, Themis Bioscience →
5 Ilkka Haukijärvi Winning The Infinite Game - Why Great Leaders Embrace Failure (Ilkka Haukijärvi) Ilkka Haukijärvi · CEO who built a global vaccine CRO from scratch; former Director of HR at a Finnish university →
4 Jesper Brandgaard Ownership Of The Downside | Elite Leaders Under Pressure (Jesper Brandgaard) Jesper Brandgaard · Chairman of LEO Pharma and former CFO of Novo Nordisk (18 years) →
3 Oliver Schacht An IPO Is Just The Beginning | The Real Fight Starts When You Go Public (Oliver Schacht) Oliver Schacht · Biotech executive and former public-company CEO; PhD-trained molecular biologist →
2 Edwin Moses Feeling Out Of Place. The Story Behind Edwin Moses And How Insecurity Fueled Optimism Edwin Moses · Chairman Grey Wolf Therapeutics. Chairman and CEO Ablynx (until 2018) →
1 Thaminda Ramanayake Leaving Ego Aside - Inside the BioNTech CureVac Deal Thaminda Ramanayake · CEO Anaveon, CBO CureVac (until 2025) →

Stream on these platforms

Christian Rados

“The CV tells you what someone can do. Stage fit and need fit tell you whether it will work here.”

Christian Rados, founder of Rados Recruiting. Munich.

Questions I get on the first call.

About the firm

What is Rados Recruiting?

Rados Recruiting is a boutique executive search firm for biotech, based in Munich. I founded it in 2020, after nine years as a biotech headhunter, and I run every mandate myself. The seats: CEO, CFO, CMO, CSO, CBO, COO, CTO and board, permanent, interim or fractional, for venture-backed and listed biotech from Seed to Public, in Europe and the US.

Permanent C-level placements close in under 30 days, interim placements in three. Permanent placements carry a 12-month guarantee: if the person leaves within a year, I run the search again at no additional fee. Every search runs through the Rados Method, two fits in fixed order: stage fit, then need fit.

What is the Rados Method?

The Rados Method is the framework I use to judge a biotech leadership hire. It has two fits, always in this order. Stage fit is the company side: which capabilities the seat demands at the company's stage, and which needs the seat can feed. Need fit is the person side: whether the seat keeps feeding the two of six human needs that drive the person, so they stay and do their best work.

The method starts before the usual basics. My briefing begins with the company, not with the job description. Skill, experience, location, contract type, availability and languages I check on every candidate anyway, the way every serious HR team or agency does. Most searches stop there. The full method is on the Rados Method page.

How is Rados Recruiting different from large global executive search firms?

Large firms sell process. A partner pitches the role, an associate runs the search, a researcher builds the longlist, and three months later you receive a shortlist.

I sell judgement. Every mandate runs through the Rados Method, a structured assessment on two fits, in fixed order: stage and need. The method starts before the usual basics: with the company, its stage, and what the seat has to feed. Skill, experience, location, contract, availability and languages I check on every candidate anyway, the way every serious HR team or agency does. Most searches stop there: people get hired for their skills and let go for their personality, and nobody checked the two fits. Not gut feeling, not introducing two people I happen to know, not random LinkedIn outreach. One person owns every mandate from the first conversation to the placement.

Fifteen years of biotech network, research I run with AI, and a structured method: that is why shortlists arrive in days, not weeks. Permanent C-level placements close in under 30 days. Interim placements in three.

What kinds of roles do you place?

C-level and senior leadership for venture-backed and listed biotech across Europe and the US. CEO, CFO, CMO, CSO, CBO, CCO, COO, CTO, Independent Directors and Chairpersons. Permanent, interim, and fractional.

Most mandates are at Seed through Series C companies, most of them clinical-stage, with one or two clinical assets in or approaching Phase 1b or 2.

Geographies include Munich, Vienna, Basel, Berlin, Copenhagen, Ghent, Oxford, Cambridge UK, Boston, New York, and the San Francisco Bay Area.

What is the difference between permanent, interim, and fractional executives?

Permanent placements are long-term C-level hires, usually employed by the company, meant to build and lead a function over time. Interim executives are full-time temporary leaders for defined periods, typically three to twelve months, during clinical readouts, restructurings, or leadership gaps. Fractional executives are part-time senior leaders, from two days a month to a few days a week, on an ongoing or retainer basis.

I place all three. Interim C-level placements in three days. Typical mandates include Interim CMO during a clinical readout, Fractional CFO before Series A, and Interim CEO between cycles.

Each engagement model has its own implications for legal structure, statutory officer responsibility, and time commitment. For a full guide on engagement models and statutory officer responsibility, see the complete guide.

How fast can you fill a C-level role?

Permanent C-level placements close in under 30 days from briefing to signed offer. Interim placements close in three days. Compared to the four to six months typical of global search firms, the difference is structural, not a side effect.

Fast is the time to a shortlist, not a shortcut on diligence. Candidates surface in days because I built the network years ago and keep it warm, not because I compress the evaluation. The referencing, the assessment of capability and human needs, and the chemistry calls still happen in full.

A boutique model with one person owning the mandate removes the organisational drag. Speed comes from knowing the people, not from skipping the work.

Do you also place Board members and Chairpersons?

Yes. Independent Directors, Chairpersons, and strategic advisors for biotech companies and biotech funds. Board mandates run as quiet, slow, deliberate searches, different from executive search in tempo but built on the same principle: one person owns the mandate.

The companies that retain me for board work want directors with real operational depth in clinical development, regulatory affairs, business development and licensing, or commercial launch. Not names for the deck. Directors who open doors, sharpen the strategy and give the next investor a reason to trust the company.

How is your fee structured?

Permanent executive search: a retainer of 30 percent of first-year compensation. Startups at Seed stage or under five people: special rates, on request. Interim and fractional: hourly rates, day rates or a monthly retainer, agreed per mandate.

I go through the investment and the contract structure in the first conversation. Nothing hidden.

About specific roles

When does a biotech actually need a strategic CFO, not just a financial manager?

Most early-stage biotechs do not need a CFO. They need a financial manager who builds a clean monthly close, manages the cap table, and supports the next financing. Jan De Kerpel said this directly on Willing to Win: "In early stage companies, the CFO role is not a CFO role. It is actually a financial manager role. It is only when companies mature that it becomes truly a strategic CFO role."

The strategic CFO becomes necessary when financing decisions move from supporting the CEO to co-leading with the CEO. That moment typically arrives between Series B and Series C, when the company is building real financial scenarios for commercial readiness, structuring institutional rounds, and beginning serious IPO or M&A conversations.

Hiring a strategic CFO three years too early means paying twice for the role and watching the person leave out of frustration. Hiring one a year too late means the CEO carries the financing burden alone and operating decisions get worse.

When is the right moment to bring in a Chief Medical Officer?

Not when the asset is three years from first-in-human. At that stage the company needs a Medical Advisor or a fractional CMO, two days a month.

The full-time CMO becomes necessary around 12 to 18 months before the first clinical readout that will define the value of the asset, typically late Phase 1b or early Phase 2. From that point on, the CMO is running the trial design, the regulatory strategy, the KOL relationships, and the clinical narrative for the next financing.

The CMO who designs Phase 2 is almost never the CMO who runs Phase 3 in seven markets. Companies that delay the CMO hire pay for it in trial momentum and regulatory missteps. Companies that hire too early end up with an underemployed senior executive looking for a different job within twelve months.

When should a founder-CEO transition out of the role?

Almost every founder-CEO faces this question eventually, and most face it later than they should. The founding CEO and the commercial CEO are different jobs, not two stages of the same job.

The skills that built the company are conviction, hands-on operation, fundraising from the science, and founder compatibility with a small board. They are not the skills that run a commercial organisation of 200 people through an FDA approval and a market launch.

The signals that a transition is due include: the board having repeated private conversations about CEO readiness, the founder's own time consumed by operational decisions they were never meant to make, financing conversations stalling because investors want to see institutional leadership, or the next round structurally requiring it.

The founder-CEOs who are honest with themselves recognise the moment. The others wait for the board to force it, which usually happens a year too late and at a higher cost. I judge this transition on both fits, with the weight on need fit.

Let's talk.

A first conversation is the cheapest part of any executive search. Sixty minutes on a call to understand the stage you're in, what you actually need, and whether I'm the right person to help.